The Enid News and Eagle, Enid, OK

Opinion

February 22, 2014

A little more love, a little less litigation

ENID, Okla. — “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

That is the wording of section one of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, one of the so-called Reconstruction Amendments.

The amendment prohibits states from crafting laws that treat anyone differently from anyone else, regardless of race, creed or sex.

Of course, section two of the selfsame amendment discusses the election of representatives by the vote of males over the age of 21.

The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, but it took until 1920 and the 19th Amendment for women to be allowed to vote.

Americans of color were not guaranteed to vote until passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, proving that it often takes years of struggle before it is assured that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” truly means all persons.

Just the year before, the Civil Rights Act outlawed discrimination against anyone because of their race, religion or sex.

Now Arizona has seemingly flown in the face of the 14th Amendment, as well as the Civil Rights Act.

On Thursday evening the Arizona state House passed a measure that would, in effect, allow business owners to discriminate against gays on the basis of “sincerely held” religious beliefs.

The measure, which passed 33-27, now goes to the desk of Gov. Jan Brewer, as it was previously approved by the state Senate.

Republican supporters of the measure say it was designed to protect the religious freedoms of business owners and not to encourage discrimination against homosexuals.

Supporters point to the case of a New Mexico photographer who was successfully sued after she refused to take wedding pictures of a gay couple because of her religious beliefs.

In 2006, photographer Elaine Huguenin turned down a lesbian couple that wanted to hire her to document their same-sex commitment ceremony. The couple easily found another photographer, and at a lower price, but they sued Huguenin, winning a judgment of $6,637.94 in court costs.

Huguenin appealed, the case eventually going to the New Mexico Supreme Court, which upheld the lower court’s ruling. Now a request has been made to the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case. The high court’s decision on that request is expected next month.

The Arizona legislation would protect business owners from facing discrimination lawsuits.

So has this turned into a battle royal between religious freedom and discrimination laws, with free speech entering the ring as a third party? So it seems.

Critics say the law is rife for potential abuse, one calling it “state-sanctioned discrimination.” Supporters call those arguments preposterous, calling the measure instead a defense of religious freedoms and rights.

No one should be forced to do anything that is against his or her religious beliefs. But neither should people be discriminated against because of their sexual orientation.

Huguenin says she does not discriminate against all gay people, which would be against New Mexico law.

Instead, in her request to the Supreme Court, she says she would “gladly serve gays and lesbians — by, for example, providing them with portrait photography,” but that by photographing a civil union ceremony, she was violating her religious views on gay marriage.

The matter may well wind up going to the highest court in the land. But perhaps it should be judged by another standard: WWJD, or What Would Jesus Do?

Jesus loved. He consorted with lepers, prostitutes, tax collectors and other sinners. His was a message of love. He loved his enemies and, in fact, prayed for them.

He didn’t agree with them, certainly, or condone their actions, but he loved them nonetheless.

Perhaps what we need is a lot more love, and a lot less litigation.

Mullin is senior writer of the News & Eagle. Email him at jmullin@enidnews.com.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • David Christy col. use clip.jpg America: Braving the ‘Dirty 30s’

    The stories I most remember are of my dad and his parents enduring the Great Depression of the 1930s.
    It seems they lived right in the heart of the Dust Bowl as it savaged the Southern Plains, making the Great Depression all the more overwhelming for those who endured.

    July 25, 2014 1 Photo

  • OCES has been a valuable resource for 100 years

    A large part of what OCES employees do is provide valuable services and research for agriculture producers, concerning both crops and livestock.

    July 25, 2014

  • Jeff Mullin mug 2012.jpg David, Goliath at it again in Gaza Strip

    Israel has long seen itself as David, standing firm against a hostile neighborhood full of Goliaths.

    July 24, 2014 1 Photo

  • DHS must come up with future plans for NORCE, SORC facilities after they are closed

    NORCE is scheduled to close in August 2015. Currently, 15 residents remain at the facility, awaiting transfer to a private setting, and there also are 60 state employees on the NORCE payroll.

    July 24, 2014

  • Never leave a child or a pet alone in a car

    With temperatures soaring to near or above 100, parents need to know they can’t leave their children alone in a locked vehicle. In 10 minutes, a vehicle’s temperature can climb 19 degrees. A child’s body heats up three to five times faster than an adult’s, and it only takes a few minutes before a child can become dangerously overheated, according to Safe Kids USA.

    July 23, 2014

  • Will Rogers web.jpg Will Rogers Daily Telegrams 7-24-2014

    I am beginning to believe that Mellon is the poorest Treasurer we ever had. I would like to be Treasurer. Here would be my policy, and you see if it wouldn’t be the best thing for America:
    Save nothing, have nothing in there. Then Congress and the entire nation could have nothing in view only what they made themselves.
    A Candidate.

    July 23, 2014 1 Photo

  • Jeff Mullin mug 2012.jpg State of the state: Things are not as good as they could be

    Draper wants to split Cali up into six separate states — Silicon Valley, around the San Francisco Bay Area; Central California, including cities like Bakersfield; West California, including Los Angeles and its suburbs; South California, including San Diego; North California, centered on Sacramento and Jefferson, in the far northern part of the state.

    July 22, 2014 1 Photo

  • Voters have decisions to make in August races

    Democrats will have two runoffs to decide. One will be choosing their party’s nominee for state superintendent. Freda Deskin will face John Cox. The winner will face Republican nominee Joy Hofmeister in the November general election.
    The other race is for the party nominee to replace retiring U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn. Jim Rogers will face Connie Johnson. The winner will face Republican nominee U.S. Rep. James Lankford in November.

    July 22, 2014

  • Going postal

    Waukomis residents have the opportunity to have their voices heard in regard to the future of their post office.

    July 22, 2014 1 Story

  • New dorm

    Breaking ground on a new dormitory at Northern Oklahoma College Enid is another step in the evolution of the campus.

    July 20, 2014 1 Story

Featured Ads
House Ads