The Enid News and Eagle, Enid, OK

Ag

September 15, 2012

Ohio beef checkoff vote is really odd, but legal

According to Chicago legend, a tombstone somewhere in the city reads:  “John Smith, Born 1934, Died 1981, Voted 1984, 1988, 1992.”

What makes the joke funny, of course, is its resemblance to the truth. Chicago’s well-deserved reputation for election shenanigans is just that, well deserved.

Despite that legacy, cattle cannot vote in either Chicago or Illinois. In Ohio, however, they will on Sept. 24, 25 and 26 when a statewide referendum will ask Buckeye cattle growers to double the current $1-per-head beef checkoff.

Under the federal, non-refundable beef checkoff, 50 cents of every dollar underwrites national beef promotion and research. The other 50 cents is controlled by state beef councils.

If Ohio beef and dairy producers approve the referendum, the second dollar — which will raise an estimated $1.1 million per year, or three times the state’s current take — will be controlled entirely by the Ohio Beef Council. The second dollar, though, will be refundable upon request.

For the referendum to pass, however, explains Elizabeth Harsh, executive director of the Ohio Beef Council, it must be approved by two-thirds of those voting who also represent 51 percent of the cattle voting.

Yep, two-thirds of all voters holding 51 percent of the cattle voting must approve the referendum for Ohio to collect the second dollar.

That seems like a tall fence but in reality, says Dave Huchins, an Ohio member of Buckeye Quality Beef and R-CALF, a Montana-based beef group, it’s easy to do both without breaking stride. The key is that anyone who was nicked by the $1 federal checkoff in the last year can vote.

That means any 9-year-old or 16-year-old or 60-year-old that sold one or 1,000 head of cows, calves or canners and paid the checkoff is eligible to vote.

It also means that the two-thirds majority of humans needed to double the checkoff is easily manipulated by, say, a school bus of farm kids showing up to vote at any polling site in the state — the department of agriculture near Columbus, Ohio State University county extension offices or the Ohio Cattlemen’s Association state office.

That’s right; cowboys or cow-kids can vote to double their state’s beef checkoff at the office of the state affiliate of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), the checkoff’s chief hired hand.

But don’t worry if that appears like a Chicagoan walking into President Obama’s re-election headquarters to cast a presidential vote because, as state exec Harsh quickly explains, “It’s the law in Ohio.”

And you can vote by mail, also, on a photocopied ballot from, say, a neighbor or maybe even from a state cattle organization that stands to materially benefit from the passage of the $1-million-per-year referendum.

That, too, is the law in Ohio.

In fact, the group that proposed doubling the checkoff, the Ohio Cattlemen’s Association, also gathered the necessary signatures (1,000 of the state’s estimated 15,000 cattle producers) to hold the vote.

It also wrote the ballot question to be voted on and suggested the late September voting dates that, golly gee, fall smack in the middle of corn and soybean harvest.

None of these coincidences are, in fact, coincidental. That’s just the way it is in the $1.5 billion-a-year checkoff industry in American agriculture: conflict of interest isn’t a worry; it’s a business plan.

Look no further than the entire, five-member team of Ohio’s beef checkoff governing body, the Ohio Beef Council, and the five-person staff of Ohio Cattlemen’s, the state’s chief beef lobby.

All five for both groups are the same people.

That’s not unusual in the clubby world of the beef checkoff. The same checkoff employees guarding the purse in 18 states, including Ohio, are the same people with their hand in it. In checkoff parlance, these folks are known as “two-hat execs;” they are the state’s beef checkoff managers and the state’s head cattle lobbyists.

Eighteen. In charge of tens of millions of checkoff dollars coming in and going out and some, like Ohio, already have their own $1 additional checkoff.

“There’s only one word for that system,” says one state beef official, “and that word is corrupt.”

Whew, for a moment I thought the word was going to be “Chicago.”

 

©  2012 ag comm

1
Text Only
Ag
  • Trent Milacek web.jpg Despite poor harvest, wheat price falls

    I grew up and currently reside on our family farm southwest of Waukomis.

    July 26, 2014 1 Photo

  • Master Gardener logocmyk.jpg Gardeners share their favorites

    Annuals only last one season, but they are important because of the great variety of flowers that keep the garden colorful throughout the summer.

    July 26, 2014 1 Photo

  • Conservation workshop set

    The workshop will be 6 p.m. at the Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Center, 316 E. Oxford.

    July 26, 2014

  • Jeff Bedwell Consider safety of forage beforehand

    Drought conditions of the past three to four years and in particular the past eight months had hay/forage inventories at critically low levels. The most recent period ranked as the third-driest period in recorded history. Not unlike the farmers and ranchers of other times of drought, ag producers now have been very resourceful to not only replace hay supplies that have dwindled but also add much-needed revenue to farm income.

    July 19, 2014 1 Photo

  • Right to Farm web 1.jpg Ag industry seeks right to farm

    The emerging battle could have lasting repercussions for the nation’s food supply and for the millions of people worldwide who depend on U.S. agricultural exports. It’s also possible the right-to-farm idea could sputter as a merely symbolic gesture that carries little practical effect beyond driving up voter turnout in local elections.

    July 19, 2014 2 Photos

  • farm - Burlington FFA web.jpg Burlington students attend camp

    More than 1,600 FFA members from 289 Oklahoma FFA chapters attended one of four three and one-half day sessions from June 29-July 12.

    July 19, 2014 1 Photo

  • farm - Oklahoma's Dirty Dozen poster 150dpi_W.jpg Poster targets invasive plants

    They all have more than four letters, but they are certainly bad words in the state of Oklahoma.

    July 12, 2014 1 Photo

  • farm - Rick Nelson web.jpg Simple steps can prevent fungus infection

    July 12, 2014 1 Photo

  • Help plants survive the summer heat

    The July hot weather has arrived, and Oklahoma State University has some suggestions for helping with our gardening needs this month.

    July 12, 2014

  • farm - 4-H_W_W.jpg State 4-H honors volunteers

    A group of dedicated parents and volunteers with Oklahoma 4-H Youth Development Program gathered recently in Stillwater for learning, sharing of ideas and recognition of dedication to Oklahoma’s youth.

    July 12, 2014 1 Photo

Featured Ads
Facebook